{
  "format": "arthurs-review-publication-proof/v1",
  "createdAt": "2026-07-13T15:42:02.901Z",
  "publicUrl": "https://blog.leesaitool.com/commentary/dont-give-everything-to-morals",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-08T06:59:48.842Z",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-11T10:33:02.773Z",
  "article": {
    "titleZh": "道德与理性",
    "titleEn": "Morality and Reason",
    "slug": "dont-give-everything-to-morals",
    "category": "commentary",
    "excerptZh": "哪里来那么多坏人",
    "excerptEn": "Where Are All These Bad People Coming From?",
    "seoDescription": "",
    "bodyZh": "我想从马克思和恩格斯在我眼中最大的贡献谈起，那就是他们将性别不平等识别为关乎社会地位和财产利益的议题，而非仅仅归咎于男性的道德上比较邪恶。\n\n换言之，马克思和恩格斯可以称为**现代女权主义之父**！在此之前的女性思想家大多认为，女性的受压迫与受限制源于男性**道德上**比较邪恶。（当然，这必须怪男性限制了她们受教育的机会与发展）马克思意识到，这种压迫实则是私有制的产物，也是男性掠夺生产资料的后果；这种掠夺迫使女性在经济上依附于男性，从而导致了不平等。而资本主义正是利用了这种依附关系，迫使女性从事长时间的无偿劳动。\n\n这一逻辑同样适用于当下的政治。特朗普并非真的要把移民及海关执法局派往明尼阿波利斯来**执法**！他的真实意图是迫使当地居民在中期选举中投票给共和党。同理，他那看似没文化的言谈方式，实则是为了吸引特定群体的选民。爱泼斯坦案折射出的并非爱泼斯坦、克林顿或比尔等人的邪恶，而是司法部门在面对精英阶层时的无力。\n\n透过这些案例，可以发现我们必须抵制那种将事件简单归咎于个人道德的冲动。尽管人类是非理性的，但这并不意味着人类的每一个行为都缺乏理性。毕竟，金钱与权力在你的决策过程中非常重要，难道不是吗？！\n",
    "bodyEn": "I want to start with what I think Marx and Engels contributed the most — they identified gender inequality as a question of social status and property interests, not just a matter of men being morally worse than women.\n\nIn other words, Marx and Engels can legitimately be called **the fathers of modern feminism**! Before them, most female thinkers believed that women's oppression and confinement stemmed from men being **morally** worse. (Sure, you could blame men for blocking women's access to education and development.) But Marx saw that this oppression was actually a product of private property — a consequence of men seizing the means of production. That seizure forced women into economic dependence on men, which produced inequality. And capitalism exploited exactly that dependence, forcing women into long hours of unpaid labor.\n\nThis same logic applies to politics today. Trump isn't really sending ICE to Minneapolis to **enforce the law**! His real goal is to pressure local residents into voting Republican in the midterms. Same thing with his deliberately crude way of speaking — it's calculated to attract a specific voter base. The Epstein case doesn't reveal Epstein, Clinton, Bill, and the rest as uniquely evil individuals — it reveals the judicial system's powerlessness when it faces the elite class.\n\nThese examples point to the same thing: we need to resist the impulse to reduce everything to personal morality. Yes, humans are irrational — but that doesn't mean every single human action is irrational. After all, money and power play a huge role in your decision-making, don't they?!",
    "coverImagePath": "uploads/2026/05/1b54878d-20da-40aa-a6fb-daf5f695158d.webp",
    "tags": []
  }
}